Note on Beyond Credibility via Mandy Brown
That is, faced with the horror of women’s experience, Freud rejected the evidence in front of him. Rather than believe the women he had collaborated with, and so be forced to revise his image of the respectable men in his midst, he chose to maintain that respectability by refusing the validity of his own observations. He would go on to develop theories of human psychology that presumed women’s inferiority and deceitfulness—in a way, projecting his own lies onto his patients.
Is this not how all supremacy thinking works? To believe that one people are less human or less intelligent or less capable is to refuse to see what’s right in front of you, over and over and over again. In order to recant his own research, Freud had to cleave his mind in two.
We must refuse to tolerate supremacists in our midst because their beliefs do real and lasting harm, because their speech gives rise to terrible violence. But we must also refuse them because they are compromised. They cannot trust their own minds. And so cannot be trusted in turn.
I would quote the post in full, but you should just go read the source.
Honesty is challenging and uncomfortable, and supremacy is dishonest.
Reference
- Notes
- human-psychology, racism
- Beyond Credibility
-
Permalink to
2025.NTE.145
- Edit
← Previous | Next → |
Note on Postgres 18 via brandur.org |